Critical Steps in Pulse Oximeter Verification: Achieving Stability, Synchronization, and Analytical Precision

Introduction: Verification Defines Trust in Pulse Oximetry

Pulse oximeters are among the most widely used physiological monitoring devices—found in hospitals worldwide. Yet, behind every reliable SpO₂ reading lies a complex scientific process: verification against reference standards.

Pulse oximeter verification studies (or pivotal studies) confirm how closely a device’s functional oxygen saturation (SpO₂) values align with the true arterial oxygen saturation (SaO₂), measured through co-oximetry. Achieving regulatory-grade accuracy demands more than collecting data points; it requires detailed data collection, stable physiology, and precise analysis at every stage of measurement.

At Parameters Research Laboratory (PRL), these principles form the foundation of our verification protocols—designed to meet FDA and CE mark expectations for accuracy, traceability, and inclusivity.

The Anatomy of a Pulse Oximeter Verification Study

ISO 80601-2-61 is the international standard that defines the basic safety and essential performance requirements for pulse oximeter equipment. It specifies how to substantiate SpO₂ accuracy—most notably via controlled desaturation studies in healthy volunteers with laboratory co-oximetry (SaO₂) as the reference.

A verification study evaluates a pulse oximeter’s accuracy across a controlled range of oxygenation states—typically from normoxia (~100% SaO₂) down to hypoxic plateaus near 70%. Participants’ oxygen levels are carefully reduced under continuous physiological monitoring within a controlled desaturation laboratory.

At each plateau, when the oxygen saturation is relatively stable, arterial blood samples are collected and analyzed to establish reference SaO₂ values, which are compared directly to the device’s reported SpO₂ readings. 

The difference between these two values forms the basis for key performance metrics such as bias, precision, and Arms (root mean square error)—the parameters used to determine device accuracy and regulatory clearance.

Critical Step 1: Achieving Physiological Stability Before Sampling

The first requirement for valid reference data is ensuring that oxygenation is stable at each desaturation level. Instability, even within a few percentage points, can compromise bias and accuracy.

At PRL, stability is controlled through continuous monitoring of:

• End-tidal oxygen (EtO₂) and carbon dioxide (EtCO₂) levels are maintained

• Monitoring vital signs

• Recording and assessing the reference pulse oximeter's performance and perfusion

Once these indicators confirm equilibrium, the lab proceeds with blood sampling and device data capture—ensuring that paired data points represent the same physiological state.

Critical Step 2: Sampling and Reference Measurement

Synchronization between the reference SaO₂ measurement and the pulse oximeter under test is one of the most critical aspects of verification.

To achieve this:

• A time-synchronized acquisition system captures physiological signals from multiple reference monitors

• The pulse oximeter under test is time-synchronized with PRL’s acquisition system

• Each arterial blood draw is time-stamped at the moment of sampling

This end-to-end synchronization—PRL’s key differentiator—minimizes sampling-to-reading lag and reduces data pairing errors.

Critical Step 3: Stable Blood Gas Analysis

Accuracy of reference data depends not only on timing but also on analytical stability. Co-oximeters provide laboratory-grade analytical quality for pulse oximetry validation, pairing multi-wavelength precision with automated QC and precise sample handling to yield stable, reproducible SaO₂ references across the full desaturation range.

PRL employs the following controls to ensure analytical integrity:

• QC verification of the co-oximeters

• Redundant analyzer systems

• Temperature-controlled analysis at 37 °C to preserve physiological conditions

The co-oximeters have a built-in Automatic Quality Management system that provides continuous quality assurance by automating calibration, quality control, and system checks:

• Executes scheduled and on-demand calibrations and QC

• Performs system self-checks and advanced clot detection to protect sample integrity

• Automates logging and reporting to support audit trails and regulatory compliance

These measures guarantee that every reference value is traceable, stable, and regulator-ready—a standard that supports consistent performance metrics across studies.

Critical Step 4: GCP Compliance

Regulatory submissions depend on more than data quality—they require proof of data integrity and document control. Every document, blood sample, study event, and synchronization point must be fully documented. PRL designs studies that adhere to good clinical practice (GCP) and ISO 80601-2-61 principles, ensuring transparent, reproducible, and regulator-ready reports and Trial Master Files.

PRL maintains regulatory documents that capture:

• Ethics & Oversight - IRB approval and continuing review

• Document Control – SOPs and version control for all study materials

• Qualified Personnel - Documented training, delegation logs, and role clarity for investigators and study staff

• Informed Consent - Understandable, IRB approved consent with version control and process documentation

• Sample Size & Statistics - Pre-specified analysis plan, handling of missing data, and ISO 80601-2-61 analyses.

• Study Events Documentation - Before, during, and after the controlled desaturation study and arterial line placement

• Risk-Based Monitoring - Centralized monitoring during and after study completion for a complete Trial Master File

This transparent data management structure ensures that verification datasets are both scientifically valid and defensible under FDA and CE review.

Critical Step 5: Inclusive and Comprehensive Data Collection

Modern pulse oximeter verification also requires inclusivity. The Open Oximetry Project and global regulatory guidance emphasize validating performance across diverse skin tones, perfusion levels, and physiological conditions.

PRL incorporates inclusive recruitment guided by the Monk skin tone scale, ensuring that reference data represent the diversity of real-world users. This inclusion strengthens both device accuracy claims and ethical research integrity.

Conclusion: Verification Built on Synchrony and Stability

Pulse oximeter verification is more than a regulatory formality—it’s the foundation of clinical trust in optical monitoring technology. Each SaO₂ reference value must reflect true, stable physiology, and each comparison must occur at the exact moment of measurement.

Through rigorous control of physiological stability, synchronized analysis, and through documentation, PRL delivers reference data that meet the highest standards of accuracy and reproducibility, empowering medical device developers to bring safe, validated technologies to market with confidence.

Ready to get started... contact us today!

*See Disclaimer regarding AI-generated content