Arterial Lines in Physiological Monitoring Studies: Why They Matter for Blood Pressure and Pulse Oximetry Validation

Engineering leaders developing physiological monitoring devices often encounter references to “arterial line measurements” in validation standards and technical literature. Although arterial lines are invasive and placed in clinical environments, the data they generate is central to how the industry defines accuracy for non-invasive technologies. 

This article explains what an arterial line is, why its measurements are considered a benchmark, and how arterial line data is used in the context of blood pressure and pulse oximetry evaluation during clinical research studies. 

What Is an Arterial Line? 

An arterial line (commonly called an “art line” or “a line”) is a thin catheter inserted into an artery by qualified clinical personnel. Once placed, it provides: 

• Beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure measurements 

• Continuous waveform data 

• Direct sampling access for laboratory analysis 

Because this method measures pressure directly inside an artery, rather than estimating it externally, its readings are considered highly precise and serve as a reference in many technical discussions around device validation. 

Why Arterial Line Data Is Valuable in Blood Pressure Validation 

Non-invasive blood pressure devices—including wearable BP monitors and cuffless systems—are typically evaluated using standards such as ISO 81060-2 and ISO 81060-3. These standards outline how to compare device readings to arterial line reference measurements. 

While auscultation is the most common reference in cuff-based pathways, arterial-line data offers richer hemodynamic context: 

• Continuous waveforms and blood pressure trends 

• Characterize hemodynamic behavior and waveform morphology 

• Benchmark rapid physiological changes  

• Inform algorithm development during early R&D 

For engineers, understanding arterial-line performance characteristics helps clarify the limitations and expected behavior of non-invasive BP technologies during protocol development and regulatory planning. 

Arterial-Line Relevance in Pulse Oximetry Studies 

Pulse oximetry validation in controlled desaturation or hypoxia lab settings, establish the accuracy of SpO₂. Following international standard guidance ISO 80601-2-61 for pulse oximetry and controlled desaturation studies, an indwelling arterial line enables rapid, blood sampling that is analyzed using co-oximetry—the reference “functional SaO₂” against which SpO₂ is verified. Open Oximetry Project and other clinical community initiatives often discuss arterial line derived SaO₂ measurements because they: 

• Provide direct arterial blood gas values used to determine true oxygen saturation 

• Repeated blood draws that are precisely time-aligned to device readings 

• Document dyshemoglobin levels for eligibility  

Taken together, these elements strengthen traceability and support reliable SpO₂ accuracy metrics. 

How PRL Interfaces with Arterial-Line Data 

PRL uses standard clinical workflows to place arterial lines for blood pressure and pulse oximetry validation studies, performed by on-staff clinical personnel.  

1. After consent and screening, the arterial line is placed in the radial artery, with ultrasound guidance and local anesthetic used to improve comfort and first-pass success.  

2. The catheter is secured and connected to a sampling system and/or continuous pressure monitoring.  

3. The sampling system enabled arterial draws during controlled desaturation without repeated needle sticks. Arterial samples are handled per lab policy to preserve SaO₂ integrity. 

4. Blood pressure monitoring includes clinical oversight and continuous blood pressure data collection. 

5. Throughout the study, sites are monitored for circulation and comfort. 

6. Removal includes hemostasis and observation. 

   
   

Placement, sampling, and removal are fully documented in the source documentation and Trial Master File to support traceability and regulator-ready evidence. Our work also focuses on: 

• Regulatory-grade CRO workflows aligned with ISO 14155 and good clinical practice 

• Skin tone inclusivity using the Monk scale and Individual Typology Angle (ITA) 

• Recruitment for different blood pressure demographics for blood pressure studies (hypo-, normo- and hypertensive) 

• Time-synchronized acquisition and reference pairing 

• ALCOA+ data integrity and inspection ready TMF with version-controlled documentation 

• Regulator-ready reporting of accuracy, precision, and subgroup analyses  

Why This Matters for Medtech CTOs 

For leaders developing physiological monitoring devices, knowing how arterial line data fits into the validation landscape helps clarify: 

• Where non-invasive methods may diverge from invasive benchmarks 

• How to set realistic accuracy expectations in study protocols 

• Why timing, waveform morphology, and rapid transitions impact data collection 

• How ISO standards derive their accuracy criteria 

A clear understanding of these dynamics improves trial protocol alignment, reduces the risk of FDA submission delays, and strengthens long-term device development and validation strategies. 

Conclusion: Arterial Line Data Sets the Bar 

Arterial line measurements represent one of the most precise ways to characterize cardiovascular and oxygenation parameters. Our team ensures that every study design—whether focused on blood pressure or pulse oximetry— that utilize arterial-line references to meet ISO expectations, ensure tight time alignment, and produce traceable, submission-ready accuracy metrics. 

Preparing for physiological monitoring validation? PRL supports protocol design, ISO alignment, and regulator-ready data generation for confident FDA and CE submissions. Contact us today!

*See Disclaimer regarding AI-generated content