The Critical Role of Human Factors in Wearable Tech Clinical Trials

“Usability testing of wearable medical device in a clinical trial"

Introduction: Usability as a Core Component of Clinical Success

The proliferation of wearable medical devices—from continuous glucose monitors to smart ECG patches and pulse oximeters—has transformed healthcare. These devices promise real-time health monitoring, greater patient autonomy, and continuous data collection. However, their effectiveness in real-world settings hinges not only on technical accuracy but also on how real users interact with them. This is where human factors engineering becomes indispensable.

Human factors, often referred to as usability engineering, is the science of designing products to match the capabilities and limitations of users. In clinical trials, especially for wearable tech, it ensures that the devices are safe, effective, and practical in everyday use. For companies developing innovative health technologies, investing in human factors early in the trial design can mean the difference between regulatory approval and costly delays.

Regulatory Landscape: Human Factors and Global Expectations

Regulatory authorities like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the UK's Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) mandate usability testing as part of the device approval process. The FDA's guidance on "Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices" outlines clear expectations: manufacturers must demonstrate that their devices can be used by the intended population without serious use-related errors.

In wearable tech trials, this means usability cannot be an afterthought. Devices that are not intuitive can result in non-compliance, unreliable data, and even safety concerns. To meet these stringent requirements, Parameters Research Lab (PRL) can ensure that every stage of a wearable clinical trial—from protocol design to data analysis—incorporates human factors best practices.

Early Integration: Designing Trials Around Real-World Use

One of the biggest pitfalls in wearable device development is failing to consider the end user experience during clinical design. PRL helps sponsors avoid this by integrating human factors at the earliest stages. Our approach includes:

• Contextual inquiry and task analysis to understand how the device will be used in the real world.

• Scenario planning to capture edge cases, such as elderly users or those with limited dexterity.

• Prototyping and formative studies to gather early feedback and iterate before large-scale trials.

We align trial protocols with realistic usage patterns, ensuring that instructions, interfaces, and training materials are suited to the users’ cognitive and physical capabilities.

Addressing the Realities of Wearable Use

Wearables are unique in that they demand prolonged, consistent use. Clinical trials must reflect this reality to produce meaningful results. Common usability challenges we address include:

• Sensor misplacement: Incorrect application of a device can skew data and render outcomes invalid. Clear, intuitive instructions and hands-on training reduce this risk.

• Adherence issues: Discomfort, appearance, or maintenance needs (e.g., charging) can cause participants to abandon device use. PRL identifies and mitigates these barriers during study setup.

• Complex interfaces: If users can’t navigate the companion app or device controls, engagement drops. We assess and simplify user interfaces before trial launch.

• Environmental factors: Variables like lighting, moisture, and physical activity impact usability. Our field-testing approach anticipates and accounts for these conditions.

Our usability evaluations go beyond "does it work"—we explore how it fits into the user's life, making trials not only more compliant but also more predictive of market success.

Formal Usability Studies: Generating Evidence for Approval

To support regulatory submissions, PRL conducts both formative and summative usability studies:

• Formative studies are integrated early, informing product iteration by uncovering potential use errors.

• Summative studies provide the validation needed to show that the final product can be used safely and effectively.

We design studies in compliance with ISO 62366 and FDA guidance, using simulated-use environments and task-based assessments. Our reports include root cause analyses and risk mitigation strategies, satisfying the expectations of regulatory reviewers.

Human Factors Testing: Diverse User Insights

With access to a wide and diverse participant pool, PRL offers comprehensive human factors testing that reflects the real-world diversity of device users. This is especially crucial for:

• Demographic inclusivity (age, education, ethnicity, tech literacy)

• Geographic variation (urban vs. rural, home vs. clinical use)

• Special populations (pediatrics, geriatrics, patients with comorbidities)

This breadth enhances the credibility of usability data and ensures the device will perform as intended in a variety of settings.

Instructional Materials and Training Validation

A device’s usability is often dependent on how well users understand the instructions and training materials provided. PRL evaluates:

• Comprehension of IFUs (Instructions for Use)

• Effectiveness of training modules

• Recall and adherence over time

Our iterative feedback process refines these materials to eliminate ambiguity and support consistent usage across all trial participants.

Integration with Broader Clinical Objectives

Human factors are not isolated from other clinical goals. At PRL, we embed usability principles across all aspects of the study, including:

• Recruitment materials and informed consent forms (ensuring readability and clarity)

• Device logging and data reporting systems (streamlining user interaction)

• Participant support channels (providing easy-to-access guidance)

This integrated approach reduces dropout rates, enhances data quality, and strengthens the validity of trial outcomes.

Conclusion: A Strategic Advantage in a Competitive Market

As wearable health technologies continue to evolve, usability will remain a defining factor in their success. Poor user experience can derail even the most innovative devices. For sponsors, partnering with a research organization that prioritizes human factors isn’t just beneficial—it’s essential.

PRL combines rigorous clinical methodology with deep human factors expertise to help sponsors de-risk their trials, accelerate timelines, and deliver products that users can—and will—adopt.

Contact PRL today to discuss how our human-centered approach can elevate your next wearable device trial.

*See Disclaimer regarding AI-generated content