top of page
Search

PRL’s Commitment to Good Clinical Practice (GCP) in Wearable Medical Device Research

  • Blog Team
  • Aug 29, 2025
  • 2 min read

Wearable medical devices are transforming how clinicians, researchers, and consumers measure and manage health. From continuous blood pressure monitoring to pulse oximetry sensors, the future of physiological monitoring depends on reliable validation in real-world and controlled environments. At Parameters Research Laboratory (PRL), we recognize that this reliability starts with a foundation of Good Clinical Practice (GCP)

Researcher conducting a GCP-compliant wearable medical device validation study at PRL.
Researcher conducting a GCP-compliant wearable medical device validation study at PRL.

Why GCP Matters in Wearable Device Trials 

Good Clinical Practice is the internationally recognized standard for designing, conducting, recording, and reporting clinical trials. For developers of wearable technologies, adherence to GCP ensures: 

  • Data integrity: Regulatory bodies such as the FDA and CE mark reviewers require clinical evidence that is accurate, verifiable, and traceable. 

  • Participant protection: Informed consent, ethical oversight by Independent Review Boards (IRBs), and transparent communication safeguard participant rights. 

  • Regulatory alignment: Studies conducted under GCP streamline FDA submission processes, reduce delays, and ensure compliance with ISO 14155 and related standards. 

Without GCP rigor, wearable medical device validation risks rejection, costly resubmissions, or delayed market entry. 


PRL’s Approach to GCP in Wearable Device Validation 

PRL integrates GCP at every stage of clinical research, from protocol development through trial reporting. Our approach includes: 

Protocol Alignment and Transparency 

Every clinical trial begins with detailed protocol development and regulator-ready clinical endpoints. Our team emphasizes CRO transparency to ensure sponsors understand exactly how trials are conducted, minimizing the risk of misalignment with FDA expectations. 

Ethical Oversight and Informed Consent 

We prioritize clear informed consent processes, reviewed and approved by Independent Review Boards (IRBs). Whether conducting controlled desaturation studies in our hypoxia lab or multi-site clinical research studies, participant protection remains paramount. 

Regulatory-Grade Data for Submissions 

As experts in physiological monitoring, including pulse oximetry, blood pressure, and respiratory monitoring, we generate clinical evidence that meets FDA and CE mark requirements. By adhering to ISO 14155 and GCP, our trials support smoother regulatory submissions and reduce the likelihood of costly delays. 

Inclusive Participant Recruitment 

Through initiatives such as the Open Oximetry Project and the use of the Monk skin tone scale, PRL ensures wearable device studies reflect diverse populations. Inclusive recruitment not only strengthens data quality but also aligns with GCP principles of fairness and participant safety. 

Setting the Standard for Wearable Device Trials 

Wearable technologies demand the same scientific rigor as any medical device. By embedding Good Clinical Practice into every study, PRL provides sponsors with confidence that their devices are tested under conditions regulators trust. From CRO risk mitigation to regulator-ready clinical endpoints, PRL is a trusted partner for developers seeking reliable validation and accelerated approvals. 

 

Ready to validate your wearable medical device with regulator-ready data? Contact PRL to learn how our GCP-driven clinical research services can support your FDA or CE mark submission. 




*See Disclaimer regarding AI-generated content

Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
bottom of page